Yes, The Re-Education Camp Manual Does Apply Domestically to U.S. Citizens

On May 3, 2012 Alex Jones' website reported finding an Army Field Manual, FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, a reference manual for running military concentration camps, or "re-education camps". If you become an activist against Obama you could end up in one, not like living in fancy hotel accommodations, rather living in the barbed wire and guard tower type of decor.

It bothers me to hear residents at the assisted living facility praising Obama, when I think he would just as soon exterminate the elderly under Obamacare, for their own good of course. I remember a woman who used to be the Medical Director on the staff here sounding shocked that I said something critical about "our president". Also, our Activities Director once stormed out of a news conference that she was conducting, where I read a list from Joseph Farah at WND containing some of the anti-American things that Obama had done to ruin our economy, claiming it wasn't true. She hasn't had a news discussion since then.

If you don't hold your tongue around these Massachusetts Democrats on the staff you might be watched closely for signs of insanity. I doubt they ever read my blog with all of its many untruths. And of course, the Boston Globe newspaper never prints anything bad about Obama. But I digress.

Read more

Bruce

"RELATED: Leaked U.S. Army Document Outlines Plan For Re-Education Camps In America

A shocking U.S. Army manual that describes how political activists in prison camps will be indoctrinated by specially assigned psychological operations officers contains numerous clear references to the fact that the policies do apply domestically to U.S. citizens.

Despite the fact that the manual is well over 300 pages long and would take hours to read properly, within minutes of posting our story yesterday a minority of commenters were claiming that the policies outlined in the document only pertained to foreign combat operations and did not apply domestically to U.S. citizens.

This is similar to the denial witnessed prior to the passage of the NDAA when some argued that the indefinite detention provisions did not apply to American citizens despite numerous legal analysts asserting they did and President Barack Obama himself acknowledging they did when he signed the bill.
...
The time for denial is over. People spent weeks arguing over the ‘indefinite detention’ provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act, ignoring assertions by top scholars and legal experts that the kidnapping provisions did apply to U.S. citizens.

It appears as though cognitive dissonance is causing some people to desperately search for any way of denying the shocking truth contained in these Army documents. This is particularly prevalent amongst Democrats and liberals, whose support for the cult of Barack Obama has blinded them to the fact that his administration is passing legislation which in many cases is far more draconian than anything Bush signed into law."