Showing posts with label Character. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Character. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Media's Anti-Trump Bias Obvious in Second Presidential Debate

 
Hello again, readers. I have been inactive on my blog for several months due to life events and medical reasons, and I plan to be more active.

The New American web site published this article written by C. Mitchell Shaw about the second presidential debate. I must tell you upfront that I am a political conservative, and I am biased that way, but it seemed to me that Trump did not get a fair shake. There are serious issues with Clinton to which the mainstream media gives scant or no attention, i.e. her mishandling of government emails, her mishandling of classified information and her mishandling of a situation in which an American ambassador was killed. The link to the article is

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24245-media-s-anti-trump-bias-obvious-in-second-presidential-debate and the first paragraph is: “The second presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump was yet another exercise in liberal media bias. Almost from the beginning, the tone was clear: Trump would be taken to task and held to answering direct questions while Clinton would be allowed to redirect, obfuscate, and dodge. The pattern held true throughout the debate.”

When we vote this time, we will choose to have Clinton’s socialism, leftism and big government, or Trump’s pursuit of “Make America great again”. As a veteran, that is the important issue for me.
 
Bruce

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Obama Tells World - "I'm not Interested in American Leadership or America Winning"

This post is from Tim Brown at EagleRising.com. I feel that the title summarizes the leadership that Obama has shown since he began his pathetic "presidency."

Bruce

http://eaglerising.com/26407/obama-tells-world-im-not-interested-in-american-leadership-or-america-winning/

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Obama’s Owellian DHS Demands “Obedience” From Its Agents

It looks like Obama, the criminal fraud and presidential imposter, runs his civilian security army, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as a little Hitler might, demanding that its agents cheerfully obey and carry out their orders. 7-minute video.

Read more

Bruce

'The New American interviewed Ramirez and reported:

“This ‘Obedience’ order just continues a long recent history of intimidation going back to the 2004 ‘gag order’ by then-Chief David Aguilar,” Ramirez told The New American in an interview, referring to a controversial non-disclosure agreement purporting to bar agents from releasing important information to lawmakers and the media. “The primary point of this all is to purge the patrol of experienced agents who refuse to go along to get along.”'

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Picture of 'martial law' alarms forensic profiler

This story is extreme, but it bears close watching. Bob Unruh of WindowsNetDaily (WND) describes Andrew G. Hodges, M.D.'s view of Obama's remarks. Hodges used a technique called "thoughtprint decoding" to solve crimes for law enforcement. Using thoughtprint decoding on Obama's speeches gives the results that Obama is a very dangerous person. Why did Obama want in 2010 a "civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as our military? Why in October 2012 was FEMA to be prepared for mass fatalities? Why has he armed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and other federal agencies, with 1.6 billion rounds of bullets over the past several months? What about the 2,700 DHS tanks? And the drones? 3 short videos - 1, 4 and 2 minutes.

Read more

Bruce

'A forensic profiler who worked on the disappearance of Natalie Holloway and the double-murder case against O.J. Simpson says he is becoming alarmed by some of the references President Obama is using.

Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who wrote “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” previously said Obama’s statement “I am not a dictator” actually meant, “I am the dictator president.”

Hodges also concluded Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.

On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”

“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger."
...
“One thing we can say for certain is that America is in a very precarious place. And such an angry wounded president arming a civilian force to the maximum when speaking of an apocalypse, evil on the horizon and a dictator president – along with his need to control law enforcement – presents an extreme warning.”'

Friday, March 22, 2013

John Boehner: I “Absolutely” Trust Obama

Money and power are what's important. Forget about the Constitution.

Read more

Bruce

'The host asked him point blank if he trusts Obama, to which Boehner responded, “Absolutely. Absolutely. There’s no issue there.”

In what capacity does he absolutely trust President Barack Obama? I can say that I trust President Obama to do the wrong thing. Like Fred Schwarz’s international bestseller published in 1960, entitled You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists). Or maybe John Boehner trusts him to act with “good intentions” no matter if what he does is wrong or right.'

Monday, March 18, 2013

Attorney General Eric Holder: If the President Does It, It’s Legal

John W. Whitehead wrote this article, which shows what Eric Holder has been doing, not for America, but for Obama. If Obama says jump, Holder asks how high. What a jerk.

Read more

Bruce

'Unfortunately, far from holding government officials accountable to abiding by the rule of law, the attorneys general of each successive administration have increasingly aided and abetted the Executive Branch in skirting and, more often than not, flouting the law altogether, justifying all manner of civil liberties and human rights violations and trampling the Constitution in the process, particularly the Fourth Amendment.
...
Clearly, it’s not the Constitution that Eric Holder is safeguarding but the power of the presidency. Without a doubt, Holder has taken as his mantra Nixon’s mantra that “When the President does it, that means it is not illegal.” It may be that the time has come to create a “non-political” and “independent” Attorney General, one who would serve the interests of the public by upholding the rule of law rather than justifying the whims of the President.'

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

President of the Lie

Here are a few paragraphs by David Kupelian on why Obama is constantly lying, that he wrote in the May 2012 issue of Whistleblower magazine. Unfortunately, some powerful Democrats sound like they believe him, and a whole bunch of clueless morons eat it right up.

Bruce

‘In one respect, the reason for Obama’s constant deception is obvious and understandable, He’s committed to leading a center-right country far to the left. How could he possibly succeed if he were honest about where he really is heading? Only a small percentage of Americans would follow. So he lies.

Unfortunately, there’s an even uglier aspect to this. You’ve heard about Obama’s notoriously “thin skin” – his near-total inability to handle criticism, to graciously deal with opposition? I’ll paraphrase Peck’s explanation of such extreme narcissism.

To maintain the illusion that you’re right all the time, even though you’re profoundly wrong, not only do you have to lie, confuse other people and tempt them to doubt the truth about you and your intentions; you also have to scapegoat the innocent.

And just look at our beloved country today. Led by Obama, the liberal-left media-fed culture scapegoats and demonizes everything good and normal. Fox News Channel is not a real news organization. Republicans want to kill old people. Sarah Palin is responsible for the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. American conservatives are complicit in the mass murder spree in Norway of Anders Breivik. It never ends. To the left, scapegoating is like breathing. It’s a very nasty form of lying.

Most of us, when we hear the word ‘evil,’ tend to think of great crimes, wars of aggression, genocides, terror attacks, Satanic cults and so on. But the building block of evil is much more “humble.” It is the lie. The lie is the cellular structure of what makes up all of the most horrendous evil in this world. We can fight it by calmly exposing lies as lies.

David Kupelian is vice president and managing editor of WND.com, editor of Whistleblower and bestselling author of “The Marketing of Evil” and “How Evil Works.”’

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The Queen of Nihilism

It seems nobody except Rand Paul wants to interrogate Hallary Clinton. Could it be because she's protecting Obama or a government gun running operation? What if she talked during the interrogation and told us about Vince Foster?

Read more

Bruce

'Obviously how and why Americans died in Libya doesn’t make any difference to her.

That’s what she told the Senate investigators. After months of stalling testimony because it might affect the presidential election, because she caught the flu and because she hit her head, this was the best Hillary had to offer.

I just can’t get over it.

“What difference does it make?”

Imagine if the culprits behind Watergate tried that defense – the what-difference-does-it-make defense? Do you suppose that dog would have hunted?'

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Obama Orders Children Murdered

The Colonel sent me this story of how evil and hypocritical the dictator Obama is to mourn the deaths of children in Connecticut while he personally ordered the deaths of other children in his drone strikes. Those other children were just "collateral damage." Sad 14-minute video.

A comment on the video: "The scary part is too many Americans are so busy being emotional about the CT incident they are not looking at the facts, nor or they thinking. Those of us who pay attention know full well why Obama wants to disarm Americans. This has happened many times in Communist countries all over the world. But Americans are very ignorant where history is concerned."

See more

Bruce

"Published on Dec 19, 2012
As Obama grandstands and uses the Sandy Hook crisis to, in the words of Eric Holder "brainwash the public" that guns are bad and the cause of violent crime and misery, We decided to show just a few of the documented cases of drone attacks that he personally ordered where children were killed. Drone attack after drone attack you will see the real face of the Globalists. This man does not care about children he cares about disarming the American people to bring in a totalitarian government."

Monday, December 17, 2012

MaoBama’s Hatred Of All Things American Comes Home To Roost

This article was written by Skip MacLure the day before Obama's "reelection." It sums up the empty suit nicely.

Read more

Bruce

"I don’t want to sound trite… or maybe I do. It didn’t take me very long to realize that my ‘truth detector’ was going off the charts when it came to Barack Hussein Obama, starting as far back as Obama’s speech in front of the DeMarxist convention in 2004, when he was still a state senator in Illinois.

He was immediately lauded as the ‘future’ of the Marxists in America. I had him pegged as an empty suit back then. Watching his ‘seamless’ rise to political prominence was suspicious to begin with. The uncontested ‘nature’ of his State Senate and US Senate runs, and the methods employed to obtain those victories, helped me to decide that Barack Hussein Obama was someone who deserved contempt, certainly not adulation.
...
Obama immediately set to work to accomplish two main goals. First, destroy the economy so that American citizens would have no choice but to come to government with open hands. Secondly, destroying our standing as a respected (and feared) world superpower, so that we would have ‘parity’ with nations whose peoples have never seen a flush toilet or had an understanding of basic personal hygiene. He ran from enemy capital to enemy capital, supplicating and groveling in front of people who wanted nothing more than the death or enslavement of our people."

Monday, November 12, 2012

Neither Hillary Clinton Nor David Petraeus Will Testify At Benghazi Hearings

How convenient for Obama.

Read more

Bruce

"Today, Congress embarks upon a week of hearings and in order to determine what actually occurred in the September 11 attacks on Benghazi.

However, it appears that two of the most important and knowledgeable sources will not be testifying."

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obama Grand Jury Video - "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig."

Today I am one of the minority of American citizens who voted against Obama. I believe that he has been lying to us since day one when he issued his first Executive order, sealing his records from the voters, and that he has not proven he is eligible to hold the office of president, making his "presidency" a criminal fraud. I have made the video that Larry Klayman showed to the Citizens Grand Jury available here, so you can see it for yourself. It takes 44 minutes to view. It shows the extremely poor "leadership" Obama has done as Commander in Chief of our armed forces, by design or by accident. You may have heard nothing bad about this imposter, as he controls what you see and don't see in the news, but the news of the four dead Americans is big enough that Obama and his crowd of unelected czars can't keep it covered up much longer. As Senator McCain put it about hiding news, "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig."

See more

Bruce

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Nov 6, 1940 Franklin Roosevelt re-elected president

This article is from Ed B. Thanks Ed.

Bruce

'Well this week we will see if the citizen (hopefully that will be who is actually voting) will determine if we will have four more years of the “progressive” agenda offered by “The Anointed One”; or if we return to a program that encourages personal initiative, personal responsibility and the rule of law as proscribed by our Constitution.

The progressive movement in the USA has its foothold being established by Woodrow Wilson and advanced significantly by FDR. Too bad we didn’t have a limitation on the number of terms one could be president back then, we might have been able to recover form FDR’s socialism programs. For some reason folks when faced with uncertainty and hardship always seems to look for Uncle Sam to bail them out. JFK/LBJ, Carter and to a lessor extent Nixon, Clinton and Bush (“W”) all advanced progressive agendas. They all felt that government had the right and responsibility to create programs to advance social justice. Social Justice is a code word for Socialism/Communism like systems. The Community Organizer currently residing at 1600 Penn Ave is more over the top than even FDR in believing that big government and its extended reach into our lives is the best solution to a fair society.

This social experiment that our fore fathers established has survived wars, natural disasters and ideological attacks from the left and the right. Progressivism is not a disease of just the left. The Nazis, the totalitarian rule of the Mullahs and the Japanese warlords all practice a form of progressivism. For at the root of progressivism is the belief that a central force (the government) is better and more capable of deciding how we should live our life. What choices we make e.g. how many children we should have, how much education we are allowed and what beliefs we should be allowed to have in order that society function in a fair and equitable way.

The progressivism of the right may be more harsh on the surface but the siren song offered by the left (free education, equal share) is just as constrictive and destructive to individual liberty.. Once you sign up for the “free lunch” you give up your liberty. Once you utter “why doesn’t the government make a law to deal with that” you give up liberty. Self reliance and self respect go together. Is it any wonder that we have become a society that seems to need daily does of Prozac? Once you become a servant of the government rather than the government being the servant of the people we no longer are a “free country”

The “European Model” of socialism has an intellectual appeal and the “good order and fairness” sound nice but put into practice we see a sub-optimized society. We seem more folks forgetting how to rely on their own initiatives and expecting hand outs. One other appealing tenet is that progressives feel no one should fail. Part of liberty is allowing everyone the right to venture into whatever they want and being allowed to fail. Failure produces knowledge every bit as important as what we learn from success and sometimes more beneficial since we see if we have the fortitude to get ourselves up and refocus our energy and do better the next time.

This week we have a choice and the test for the American voter is do we try to return to a country that fosters individual initiative, recognizes that each should have a right to success but that it isn’t guaranteed? Vote your conscience and may God guide your thinking, and may God Bless America . Vote for love of country do not vote for revenge as Obama has called for. Our country deserves better from you.

“I’m for Mitt and Paul -- I hope you will be too”'

Thursday, November 1, 2012

BHO: the ways of a sociopathic liar

After comparing Obama's actions to what he claimed to have done, it was obvious he was lying a lot of the time. Robert Ringer tells about a similar experience.

Read more

Bruce

"Obama’s problem is that he is a sociopath. What makes a sociopathic liar different from a pathological liar is that he employs lying for the specific purpose of manipulating others. This explanation fits Barack Obama perfectly, as he must certainly be the most manipulative U.S. president in history.

In 2008, he was able to manipulate the majority of the electorate by engaging in a nonstop campaign of breathtaking lies. And, even today, after bringing America to the verge of total collapse and being repeatedly caught with his pants on fire, he still has nearly half the population bamboozled."

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Liberal Treason Explained: “The Kindergarden of Eden”

When I first read this article, I thought it is too wordy. But by the time I got to the end I was impressed with the way Jim O'Neill described how a liberal mindset works and how it arrives at the conclusion that America is evil and should be destroyed a la Obama. I will try to abbreviate the essence of the article and you can decide if you want to read it. I still support death for treason in wartime though it is not politically correct to some of today's senior military officials.

Read more

Bruce

'“If they weren’t so dangerous and destructive, one could smile and pat the Modern Liberal on the head and tell him how cute he is and go on about the business of being an adult. But he is dangerous and destructive, with the True Believer’s very purpose being the total destruction of everything that God and science—most obviously Western Civilization—has ever created. ...The Modern Liberal will invariably and, in fact, inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.”—Evan Sayet “The Kindergarden of Eden”
...
Of all the harmful doctrines promulgated by liberals, perhaps none has been as devastating in its effects as relativism. Put simply, relativism is the belief that there is no such thing as objective truth—truth is relative—one person’s “truth" is no more or less valid than another person’s. Relativism has been incorporated into several insidious offshoots such as moral relativism, cultural relativism, deconstructionism, postmodernism, political correctness, and multiculturalism.
...
Moving right along, let me next touch on the decline and fall of American education—triggered in no small part by members of the Frankfurt School. Most readers are at least somewhat familiar with the Frankfurt School—that group of German Marxists who were welcomed into the United States during the Nazi’s rise to power in the 1930s. Members of the Frankfurt School repaid America’s largesse by stabbing her in the back and spreading an especially virulent form of anti-Americanism throughout US academia. Perhaps the most infectious carrier of their disease was Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979).
...
Sayet’s description of the modern liberal mindset is summarized in the quote that opened this article: “...the Modern Liberal will invariably and, in fact, inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.”

For those who know the history of the radical left in America and its infiltration and subsequent takeover of America’s educational system (via Roger Kimball’s “tenured radicals”), then Sayet’s observations are perhaps not that surprising, but to the bulk of “we the people"they will be startling indeed.

Most Americans are still unaware of the tremendous inroads that relativism and Marxist theory have made in our culture, and most conservatives have yet to hear of Herbert Marcuse’s 1965 essay “Repressive Tolerance“and remain unaware of its huge impact on liberal thought. In his essay Marcuse essentially makes the argument that being tolerant of anything but Marxist ideology is anti-revolutionary. In short, all conservative, freedom loving, capitalist, pro-American thought or speech is intolerable, and must be shut down, ridiculed, and banished whenever and wherever it is encountered—without exception. Say goodbye to free speech, and say hello to political correctness and the infamous liberal double standard.'

Monday, October 29, 2012

Justice with Judge Jeanine

This is a 4-minute video of someone else who finds Obama's actions totally offensive and unacceptable. Thanks Wayne.

See more

Bruce

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Bombshell: Benghazi Targets Painted, Air Support Overhead – Obama Calls Off Strike

More about Obama's lack of decisiveness in military operations. Three times Obama turned down requests for help! He left people to die. 6-minute video.

Read more

Bruce

"In piecing together the details of the Benghazi attack up the U.S. consulate, it is becoming clear that there were U.S. Special Operations forces on the ground, at least two drones overhead and lasers being used to paint at least one target. The question then becomes, if these things were in place for a strike against attackers, who called it off? There can only be one answer, the commander-in-chief Barack Obama."

Petraeus Throws Obama Under the Bus

Obama's lack of what it takes to be the Commander in Chief is obvious. Let's have his criminal trial that should have happened after one year, not four.

Read more

Bruce

'Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate.”

So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.

It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?'

Clinton asked for more security, Obama said no

Maybe this story will be the end for Obama.

Read more

Bruce

'(The Examiner) Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.
...
Wilkow also asked Klein about Valerie Jarrett who’s the Senior Advisor to Obama and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs, and her role in this cover-up.

Klein said, “We don’t know but we can only assume that every action that the president takes, and he said so, he is on the record saying “I don’t take any actions without passing it by Valerie Jarrett”... so we have to assume that Valerie Jarrett whose also by the way, hooked into the Chicago campaign line…she has a direct line to David Axlerod, was a part of this whole cover-up in the White House.”'

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Video; President is lying

Glenn Beck talks about Obama, Hillary Clinton, our embassy that was attacked and the Muslim "police" protecting our embassy. Remember the Nixon lies on Watergate. What did the president know, and when did he know it? 10-minute video. Thanks George for this.

See more

Bruce