Showing posts with label Medical issue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical issue. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

What do the following 10 people have in common?


Frank Olson

Henry Marshall

George Krutilek

Marilyn Monroe

President John F. Kennedy

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Senator Robert F, Kennedy

Fred Hampton

White House Counsel Vince Foster

Dr. David C. Kelly

 

According to a book, Dead Wrong: Straight Facts on the Country's Most Controversial Cover-Ups by Richard Belzer and David Wayne, all were victims of murders and their cover-ups.

 

After reading the stories I am never going to accept the “official version” of a high profile victim’s death again without double-checking it. The same disbelief applies to our government’s “official version” of why we got into wars, and events like 9/11 and the Oklahoma bombing.

 

Bruce

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Another giant nail in the coffin of psychiatry

Jon Rappoport makes one wonder about the validity of the psychiatry profession.

What if a member of your family was "diagnosed" with a mental disease with no science to support it? Should you support the expensive treatment and medication? Would you?

Bruce

Read more

"As my readers know, I’ve assembled a wide-ranging case against psychiatry.

It isn’t a science. It isn’t even close. It’s a hoax.

The bible of the profession, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM), lists some 300 separate and distinct mental disorders.

However, none of the 300 has a defining physical test for diagnosis. No blood test, no urine test, no hair test, no brain scan, no genetic assay."

Sunday, January 12, 2014

In Utero exposure to BPA May Adversely Affect Male Genital Development

Alex Jones has me interested in the chemical and medical advances that the globalists and eugenicists are and have been doing, back as far as the 1920s. If you have been reading my blog, you may have noticed articles I have posted that indicate the incremental progress that the Fabian socialists continue to make with their plans for social engineering this country and the world the way they please. Lowering the world population is a goal that is part of their plan.

Read more

Bruce

"OAKLAND, Calif., -- In utero exposure to Bisphenol-A may adversely affect male genital development, according to a Kaiser Permanente study published online in the journal Birth Defects Research.

The observational study found that the sons of BPA-exposed Chinese workers had a shortened distance between their genitals and anus -- known as anogenital distance -- compared with sons whose parents were not exposed to workplace BPA.

The association between BPA exposure during pregnancy and anogenital disease also showed a dose-response relationship, meaning the greater the BPA exposure a mother had during her pregnancy, the shorter her son’s AGD measured, according to researchers."

7 Nasty Effects of BPA – The Plastic Chemical

Mike Barrett, of Prison Planet.com, wrote this disturbing article on March 26, 2013. The Food and Drug Administration considered banning the chemical, but declined.

Read more

Bruce

"Bisphenol a (BPA) is the widely used chemical found in many plastics, food can linings, and even on US dollars and receipts. Known as an endocrine-disrupting chemical that mimics the hormone estrogen, BPA has been linked to numerous negative health effects in countless studies. The worst part? While the Food and Drug Administration considered banning the chemical in March of 2012, the ban was denied, and BPA continues to be ubiquitous. So what exactly does mean? It means the entire U.S. is still subjected to the chemical’s negative effects.

Here are 7 nasty effects of BPA.

1. Breast Cancer
2. Early Puberty
3. Heart Disease
4. and 5. Infertility in Males and Females
6. Sparks Multiple Negative Brain Alterations
7. Obesity"

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

How the Feds Plan to Use the APA, NSA and Obamacare to Get Your Guns

Jim White wrote this article. Just as the Russians declared mentally ill those people who did not agree with Communism, Obama will declare mentally ill those people who disgree with him and his polisies on guns.

Thanks to George for sending this to me.

Read more

Bruce

'I wanted to dig deeper and further illustrate how all of the elements are in place now to make confiscation, due to mental illness, a reality.

If you examine the history of psychiatry, and the numerous membership organizations that sprang out of its existence, you find indisputable evidence of very close ties between psychiatry and government.
...
Political abuse of psychiatry is the purported misuse of psychiatric diagnosis, detention and treatment for the purposes of obstructing the fundamental human rights of certain groups and individuals in a society.

Examples of political abuse of the power, entrusted in physicians and particularly psychiatrists, are abundant in history and seen during the Nazi era and the Soviet rule when political dissenters were labeled as “mentally ill” and subjected to inhumane “treatments".
...
Take a look at how our veterans are being unconstitutionally disarmed, and you will get a foretaste of what in store for most law-abiding gun owners.
...
It is now a widely known fact that NSA is illegally spying on America, and probably the world. Apparently, they are even intercepting computers and installing “back-door” access on them before they reach the target consumer. The breadth and width of the criminality is staggering. Keep in mind that what whatever personal information that NSA cannot seem to hijack from us through our communications, they will get from those who voluntarily enroll in Obamacare. Before it’s all through, the Feds will have gathered enough info on you to run through their matrix and “presto,” you have a mental disorder and need to be disarmed.
...
I would caution you to also use some common sense when speaking to your physician, or even your dentist, about your problems. You never know who might be taking notes.'

Saturday, December 28, 2013

America Deconstructed by Design

This video ties in with the DHS insider post by Doug Hagmann. According to Alex the globalists are planning slavery for us non-globalists. No more freedom, no more liberty, no justice and no truth. 2014 may be the year we submit to a world government. This is not a pretty picture. Remember all the ammunition that DHS ordered? 25-minute video.

See more

Bruce

"Alex Jones joins David Knight live in studio to discuss the designed deindustrialisation of America."

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Meet the DSM: Big Pharma’s Psychiatric Bible

You manufacture pills and drugs, and you also write the reference manual for prescribimg them. You want to sell more of your drugs. Therefore you invent a new ailment for which you just happen to have the pills, and you add that ailment to the prescription reference manual. Pretty soon everyone "needs" your flu vaccine or is "crazy" and needs your drugs, now perhaps required by law. You laugh all the way to the bank. 11-minute video.

Read more

Bruce

'Since 1952, the American Psychiatric Association has published the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or the DSM, as a guideline for the classification and diagnoses of mental health issues. The DSM, according to the APA itself, “is the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals in the United States and contains a listing of diagnostic criteria for every psychiatric disorder recognized by the U.S. healthcare system.”

Earlier this year, the APA published the DSM-5, the fifth major revision of the manual.

Commonly referred to as the psychiatric diagnostic “bible,” the guide has always generated controversy. How are disorders diagnosed? What criteria are used to establish disorders in the first place? Are the categories subjective? Do they reflect cultural biases?
...
In the end, what is at stake is not merely the utility of the DSM as a diagnostic guideline, but the credibility of the psychiatric profession as a whole. As critics like Dr. Frances and others have argued, in the relentless drive to expand the number and the scope of mental disorders (with the attendant increase in potential customers it brings for the drug manufacturers), more and more people are being driven from the ranks of the normal into the care of psychiatrists. This diverts attention from the extreme cases of individuals most in need of mental healthcare and makes impersonal interactions dictated by DSM guidelines and ending with knee-jerk drug prescriptions all the more likely. For many, the direction of psychiatry has to be diverted from its current course before the very human condition itself is pathologized and medicated out of existence.'

Monday, December 2, 2013

Cell phone radiation breast cancer link - New study raises grave concerns

G. Edward Griffin has a link to an article from naturalnews.com where cell phones are again linked to cancer.

Read more

Bruce

"(NaturalNews) A new study raises concerns of a possible association between cell phone radiation exposure and breast cancer in young women."

Friday, November 1, 2013

$47 Mil to Get More Adolescents on Gardasil

This makes me think of the CIA experimenting by drugging prisoners with LSD during the cold war. Now what is the point of subjecting people to a drug with serious side effects? I bet its for profits for the drug companies.

Read more

Bruce

"The U.S. government has given dozens of state and municipal health agencies nearly $50 million to boost the number of adolescents that get a dangerous cervical cancer vaccine linked to thousands of adverse reactions, debilitating side effects and even death.

It’s as if there is no end the Obama administration’s inexplicable campaign to push the controversial vaccine, Gardasil, which is promoted as miracle shot that can prevent certain strains of cervical cancer caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV). The reality is that droves of government records uncovered by Judicial Watch show that Gardasil has been linked to thousands of adverse reactions and debilitating side effects that the administration wants to keep secret."

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

White House knew millions couldn't keep health plans

I know it's hard to believe, but it is possible that Obama lied to American citizens, again! At least he didn't tell the whole story to people about their health insurance plans.

Read more

Bruce

'President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it.

But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.

Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC News that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a "cancellation" letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don't meet the standards mandated by the new health care law.

One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience "sticker shock."

(Read more - POLL: Has your insurance changed under Obamacare?)

None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration.

The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be "grandfathered," meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don't meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example the policy would not be grandfathered.

(Read more: GOP to grill Sebelius on Obamacare )

Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, "40 to 67 percent" of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, "the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range."

That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them. (Read more below the video.)





Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, "if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan," was still saying in 2012, "If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance."

"This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn't keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn't make it either," said Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.

(Read more: Another Obamacare glitch: Data center shuts down )


The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs.

"One of the main goals of the law is to ensure that people have insurance they can rely on - that doesn't discriminate or charge more based on pre-existing conditions. The consumers who are getting notices are in plans that do not provide all these protections - but in the vast majority of cases, those same insurers will automatically shift their enrollees to a plan that provides new consumer protections and, for nearly half of individual market enrollees, discounts through premium tax credits," said White House spokesperson Jessica Santillo.

"Nothing in the Affordable Care Act forces people out of their health plans: The law allows plans that covered people at the time the law was enacted to continue to offer that same coverage to the same enrollees - nothing has changed and that coverage can continue into 2014," she said.

Individual insurance plans with low premiums often lack basic benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, or carry high deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. The Affordable Care Act requires all companies to offer more benefits, such as mental health care, and also bars companies from denying coverage for preexisting conditions.

Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president's promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care.

"What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide," Carney said. "So it's true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don't meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act."

(Read more: Verizon called on to help fix HealthCare.gov )

Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests "anywhere from 50 to 75 percent" of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters.

Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is "probably about right." She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.

A spokesman for America's Health Plans says there are no precise numbers on how many will receive cancellations letters or get notices that their current policies don't meet ACA standards. In both cases, consumers will not be able to keep their current coverage.

Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.

George Schwab, 62, of North Carolina, said he was "perfectly happy" with his plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield, which also insured his wife for a $228 monthly premium. But this past September, he was surprised to receive a letter saying his policy was no longer available. The "comparable" plan the insurance company offered him carried a $1,208 monthly premium and a $5,500 deductible.

And the best option he's found-- on the exchange so far offered a 415 percent jump in premium, to $948 a month.

"The deductible is less," he said, "But the plan doesn't meet my needs. Its unaffordable."

"I'm sitting here looking at this, thinking we ought to just pay the fine and just get insurance when we're sick," Schwab added. "Everybody's worried about whether the website works or not, but that's fixable. That's just the tip of the iceberg. This stuff isn't fixable."

Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, is raising a new baby while running her own PR firm. She said she received a letter last July from Cigna, her insurance company, that said the company would no longer offer her individual plan, and promised to send a letter by October offering a comparable option. So far, she hasn't received anything.

More from NBC News:
Credit data giant Experian tangled in ID theft case
Romanian ring that targeted online car buyers in US is broken up
Two killings do not a trend make; homicides remain rare in schools

"I'm completely overwhelmed with a six-month-old and a business," said Goldwater. "The last thing I can do is spend hours poring over a website that isn't working, trying to wrap my head around this entire health care overhaul."

Goldwater said she supports the new law and is grateful for provisions helping folks like her with pre-existing conditions, but she worries she won't be able to afford the new insurance, which is expected to cost more because it has more benefits. "I'm jealous of people who have really good health insurance," she said. "It's people like me who are stuck in the middle who are going to get screwed."

Richard Helgren, a Lansing, Mich., retiree, said he was "irate" when he received a letter informing him that his wife Amy's $559 a month health plan was being changed because of the law. The plan the insurer offered raised his deductible from $0 to $2,500, and the company gave him 17 days to decide.

The higher costs spooked him and his wife, who have painstakingly planned for their retirement years. "Every dollar we didn't plan for erodes our standard of living," Helgren said.

(Read more: 8 must-know Obamacare facts )

Ulltimately, though Helgren opted not to shop through the ACA exchanges, he was able to apply for a good plan with a slightly lower premium through an insurance agent.

He said he never believed President Obama's promise that people would be able to keep their current plans.

"I heard him only about a thousand times," he said. "I didn't believe him when he said it though because there was just no way that was going to happen. They wrote the regulations so strictly that none of the old polices can grandfather."

For months, Laszewski has warned that some consumers will face sticker shock. He recently got his own notice that he and his wife cannot keep their current policy, which he described as one of the best, so-called "Cadillac" plans offered for 2013. Now, he said, the best comparable plan he found for 2014 has a smaller doctor network, larger out-of-pocket costs, and a 66 percent premium increase.

"Mr. President, I like the coverage I have," Laszweski said. "It is the best health insurance policy you can buy."'

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

What if I told you carrots cure cancer?

Two cancer treatments on the same day!

Read more

Bruce

'(NaturalNews) Ann Cameron, an author of 15 children's books, cured her Stage 4 cancer with carrot juice only. She states, "I believe from personal experience that carrots can cure cancer - and rapidly, without chemotherapy, radiation, or other dietary changes."

On June 6, 2012, Ann had surgery for Stage 3 colon cancer. She had decided against chemotherapy and actually started feeling better, until about November 6, 2012.

A routine follow-up CT scan indicated lung cancer. She was diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer which had metastasized to the lungs. Her doctor predicted a two to three year life expectancy.
...
In her search, she came across a man who had cured his cancer with nothing but carrots. His name was Ralph Cole, and he had cured his small squamous cell cancer (on his neck) by drinking 5 pounds of carrots juiced daily. Ralph shared his carrot curing protocol freely with anyone who would listen.

On November 17, Ann began a daily regimen of 5 pounds of juiced carrots (one quart to a quart and one-third daily). Ann juiced in the morning, drank a glass and then refrigerated the rest, which she finished off throughout the day. Ann faithfully continued juicing five pounds of carrots daily.
...
On January 7, 2013, after eight weeks of daily carrot juicing, another follow-up CT scan revealed that the cancerous tumors had stopped growing, there had been some tumor shrinkage and there was a reduction in swollen lymph nodes.

March 2013: The cancer had not grown. No new cancer, no swollen lymph nodes, and tumors continued shrinking. July 30, 2013: The cancer was gone! All swollen cancerous lymph nodes had returned to normal.

Summary
• Two weeks of daily carrot juicing: no improvement.
• Eight weeks of juicing: the cancer stopped growing and tumors began shrinking.
• Four months of juicing: all the lymph nodes in the lungs were normal.
• Eight months of juicing: all the cancer was gone!'

Five year update on the guy who cured his stage IV prostate cancer with baking soda

As one who lost a son while having conventional cancer treatment, I encourage people to investigate non-conventional methods as well.

Read more

Bruce

"(NaturalNews) The guy is Vernon Johnston, and his story was first reported as a Natural News citizen journalism article in 2009.

That was around one year after being informed he was cancer-free from stage IV prostate cancer that had metastasized into the bone matter of his pelvic area in June of 2008.
...
The mainstream medical standard for considering cancer cured is five years in remission or cancer-free. That self-imposed standard is rarely met with surgeries, radiation treatments and chemotherapy sessions. Many die from those treatments within five years!

But after less than two weeks of intense bicarbonate of soda or baking soda (not baking powder) and blackstrap molasses consumption, he escaped not only cancer but toxic orthodox treatments.
...
The baking soda/molasses combination caused a drastic pH alkaline spike that oxygenated his cancer cells to their demise. Since cancer cells thrive by fermenting sugar, the molasses was the bait that allowed baking soda's alkaline influence to enter and oxygenate them (http://drsircus.com).
...
Although this author and most others wouldn't go it alone with only the baking soda-molasses protocol, it worked for him. Just like super-intense carrot juicing worked for Ralph Cole and Ann Cameron, as reported here (http://www.naturalnews.com).

The statement that there are hundreds of cures for cancer that aren't toxic and expensive is not an exaggeration. Let the Cancer Tutor help you find them."

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Elder Abuse under ObamaCare

A reader of this elder abuse article, DrKeteDC, made the following comment:

“I don't know how this pertains to Obamacare, which is horrible on its own, because this sounds like typical treatment by the medicos in a hospital. The individual becomes a number and a piece of meat to fight over. Sickening to know that this story will become even more commonplace if you aren't one of the privileged demographics. Sadly, they really don't know how to treat this on their best day. I feel very sorry for this woman.”

That is similar to how I felt my wife and I were treated when we were living in an Assisted Living facility. Since we were over 65, by definition we were senile and stupid, and we were frequently treated that way.

Read more

Bruce

'Because Jane is 74 years old and a “unit” under ObamaCare, her utility to society must be low in the complicated formula the bureaucrats have devised to kill as many inconvenient elderly as possible.

New rules under Medicare and Tricare required that a case manager be assigned to her. Jane was no longer a patient with feelings, humanity, personality, but a “case.” Think of her case manager as someone whose sole purpose was to provide as little care as possible to an elderly American in dire need.'

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Coca-Cola touts 'safe, high-quality' 'carcinogen'

I sincerely hope that none of my readers are affected.

Read more

Bruce

'Health professionals are horrified by a new ad campaign by Coca-Cola promoting its use of artificial sweeteners, including aspartame, because ingredients the iconic company calls “safe” and “high-quality” allegedly cause cancer and other diseases.

“Twenty years ago I wasn’t sure, but now there’s little doubt in my mind that artificial sweeteners can be far worse for you than sugar and fructose, and there is plenty of scientific evidence to back up that conclusion,” wrote Dr. Joseph Mercola in his online blog Mercola.com.

The Weston A. Price Foundation had expressed alarm when aspartame was proposed to be used in flavored milks for children without any notice to consumers.

“Numerous scientific studies point to toxic effects of aspartame, including cancer, digestive issues and memory impairment,” the organization said. “In spite of this evidence, the International Dairy Foods Association and the National Milk Producers Federation recently submitted a petition to the FDA to hide the chemical sweetener without declaring it on the front of the packaging.”

The organization said thousands of “adverse reactions to aspartame have been reported to the FDA, mostly concerned with abnormal brain function, brain tumors, epilepsy and Parkinson’s.’

Children’s brains “are four times more susceptible to damage from excitotoxins like aspartame than those of adults and react with ADD ADHD type symptoms, impaired learning, depression and nausea,” the Price Foundation said.

The federal government, through the FDA itself, also has commented on aspartame.'

Friday, October 11, 2013

Russian activist sent to mental institution, echoing Soviet era

What? You don't love Communism? You must be insane!

Read more

Bruce

"MOSCOW -- For the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union, a Russian court on Tuesday ordered an opposition activist to be sent to a mental institution for compulsory treatment."

Saturday, October 5, 2013

The Government Knows It's a Medical Killing Machine

Be careful if you trust the Federal Drug Administration with your health safety.

Read more

Bruce

'Here are four smoking guns that substantiate the title of this article.

Smoking gun #1: As I detailed in my two previous articles (click here and here), Dr. Barbara Starfield’s article in the July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”, spelled out the damage:

The US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. That’s well over two MILLION deaths per decade.
...
Smoking gun #2: Starfield’s report indicated that, every year in the US, 106,000 Americans die as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs.
...
Smoking gun #3: It’s common knowledge that there is a revolving door between the FDA and drug companies. Employees come and go from one organization/agency to another. The FDA and the pharmaceutical industry are, in significant respects, partners.
...
Smoking gun #4: Before the FDA considers approving a new drug, studies and clinical trials have to be done. The drug companies do those clinical trials and submit the results to the FDA.'

Thursday, October 3, 2013

The devastating truth behind Obamacare

Jon Rappoport does not trust Obamacare, with the medical community interlinked with the government.

Read more

Bruce

"I want my Obamacare! I want my Obamacare!

It’s vital to look at the real meaning of this sinister plan. It’s all about the toxic effects of mainstream medicine. That’s what the sold-out press is refusing to examine.
...
I’m not dreaming or fantasizing. I’ve been following and reporting on the medical cartel for 30 years, and I know the mindset of these people, these doctors, these bureaucrats, these pharmaceutical string-pullers behind the scenes. Obamacare is right up their alley. It’s about control, so it’s an answer to their prayers.
...
Starfield revealed what many people inside the medical establishment already knew: every year, like clockwork, the medical system was killing huge numbers of people.

Each year in the US, as Dr. Starfield reported, there are:

12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries;

7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals;

20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals;

80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals;

106,000 deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines.

The total of medically-caused deaths in the US every year is 225,000. (a conservative estimate)

This makes the medical system the third leading cause of death in America, behind heart disease and cancer."

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Alexis, Lanza, Holmes and the Psychiatric State

If you've ever lived is an assisted living facility you might see how so-called "medical experts" diagnose other people. If you are 65 or older, you are automatically senile and stupid and incapable of managing your affairs.

Jon Rappoport tells a story that reminds me of how the Soviet Union used to hospitalize those clearly insane people who didn't agree that communism was a wonderful system.

There are 297 types of "mental disorders.'

Read more

Bruce

'Whether or not these three men committed the crimes they’ve been accused of, there is no doubt scenarios have been written and established to emphasize and advertise them as mental cases.

And not only mental cases, but people “in need of psychiatric treatment…if we had only caught them in time, we could have gotten them help and then they wouldn’t have killed all those people…”

That’s the PR people at work, because gun control is only one of the items on the agenda here. The twin is MORE PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT AND DRUGGING.

And of course the way the story is being spun, anyone can go off the rails, so be on the alert, your neighbor could have a mental disorder, it’s all right, no stigma attached, he needs treatment right away.

It’s called The Psychiatric State. It’s based on myths and fairy tales about distinct and separate disorders and “good treatment” and sharing and caring in this new humane society of ours.'

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Why you should avoid taking the seasonal flu vaccine

It 1s about 98% ineffective, according to NaturalNews.com. Think about it.

Read more

Bruce

"(NaturalNews) Every year around this time, the vaccine industry, through its vast network of corporate-government health agencies and mass media partners, begins drumming fear into the minds of the public about seasonal flu in order to drive as many people as possible to get vaccinated with a flu shot. And it seems as though every year, more and more evidence also comes to light illustrating precisely why people should not get a flu shot, at least not without carefully considering the serious ramifications of participating in this annual injection ritual.
...
Last year, for instance, a study out of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota revealed that, at best, the flu shot has a measly 1.5 percent effectiveness rate -- for every 100 people vaccinated with a flu shot, only 1.5 of them will avoid getting the flu. At worst, the flu shot is entirely useless, as the same study showed that about 97 percent of people who do not get a flu shot also do not get the flu. (http://www.naturalnews.com)

Put another way, flu vaccines are about 98.5 percent ineffective, which means the vast majority of people who get a flu shot are deriving absolutely no health benefit.
...
Besides their ineffectiveness, flu shots also come with an array of potentially-deadly side effects that health authorities rarely disclose to the public. Such side effects include things like brain damage and dementia -- many flu shots still contain toxic mercury, after all (http://www.naturalnews.com/031870_flu_shots_brain_damage.html) -- seizures (http://www.naturalnews.com/029334_flu_vaccines_seizures.html), and even flu-like symptoms, which defeats the point of even getting a flu shot in the first place."

Monday, August 5, 2013

Do you mind if we store your DNA data and share it with everybody?

Thanks Jon Rappoport for sharing this story.

If you have nothing to hide, what is your problem? Are you afraid that the government is collecting personal data at the expense of your privacy? So what? Your government knows what is best for you and tries to protect you from harm, and this is the thanks you give. The greatest good for the greatest number is what's important after all. Gee, where have we heard that before? The Communist Manifesto?

Individual freedom, initiative and choice? Passe. Boring. So 1990s. The Constitution? George Bush, the father of the Patriot Act and Obama's predecessor said it was just a piece of paper. Obama ignores it anyway. Too restrictive.

Remember how the happy school children were taught in 2008 to sing songs praising the great Obama? The teachers and kids that I saw on film clearly enjoyed what they were doing. Shades of Hitler? No way.

So lighten up. Get with the Democrats and cut Obama some slack. Trust him and trust the integrity of all of his Executive orders, especially the one he issued his first day in office, declaring his records are all to be kept private. Make fun of anyone like Sheriff Joe Arpaio who says Obama used forged papers and fraud to get where he is.

Pay no mind to what the IRS is doing, or why Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid's Obamacare doesn't seem to be ready for prime time, or why the government keeps printing more money. Now get out in this fine economy and get yourself a better job.

Read more

Bruce

'Helen Wallace, writing at Public Service Europe—“UK Building DNA database in the NHS ‘by stealth’:

“In April, the Caldicott Committee, including British government chief scientist Sir Mark Walport proposed new rules for data-sharing electronic medical records. What they failed to make transparent is that genetic information including whole genomes will be integrated into medical records in the future – as part of a plan proposed by the Wellcome Trust, of which Walport used to be director.

“The plan, which is backed by United Kingdom Prime Minister David Cameron, involves sequencing the DNA of everyone in England and adding this information as an attachment to each person’s medical file. The data will then be shared with commercial companies including private healthcare companies, the pharmaceutical industry and web-based companies such as Google; without people’s knowledge or consent…'