Of Presidential Eligibility, Doubling Down and Linguistic Torts, Conclusion

Here is a long discussion of Obama's eligibility that points out what garbage he has given in response to, not to be confused with an answer to, the question of his eligibility.

Bruce

"Finally, the hypocrisy of the CRSR’s position that the Internet images should be all that is needed, because the “original” sealed certificates were obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health by Mr. Obama’s lawyers, is manifest.
...
The nagging question of “why now?” continues to perplex. After all, if the series of prior CRS Memos, the successful marginalizing of the “birthers” by virtually all media outlets and journalists and the deepening sycophancy of Mr. Obama’s supporters have all combined to create the perception that, in fact, if you even dream of questioning Mr. Obama’s eligibility, you are a nut-case…. why is there a need now for yet another novelette on the topic, the November 14, 2011 CRSR? Stay with me, as what follows may qualify in some peoples’ eyes as “Area 51” material.
...
While the person now “occupying” the White House marshals his supporters, enablers and lawyers to make sure the “response” to that question – not to be confused with an “answer” to the question – ratifies and confirms his continued residence there, substantial doubts and a growing mountain of evidence continue to accumulate indicating that, in fact and in law, not only is he ineligible under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution,, a massive and unprecedented bamboozling of the American people, not just the electorate, has taken place. In fact, the ruse today continues to take place to ensure he stays there, including, at minimum, past November 6, 2012."

Tack's Tackle Shop and the Council on Foreign Relations

Most people have heard little if anything about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which is the "country club" of former US presidents and the rich and powerful elite. I thank G. Edward Griffin for making me and my blog aware of it almost two years ago. Here is an article that contains some of the shenanigans they have been up to. Maybe we wouldn't like these guys leading our coming world government. Maybe we'll have no say in the matter.

Bruce

'After signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, President Woodrow Wilson later admitted, "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country….(America is) no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."
...
The late Carroll Quigley (mentor and advisor to former President Clinton) who was a long term member of the CFR, wrote in his book “Tragedy & Hope”: "The CFR is the American Branch of a society….which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."
...
By using the CFR as a front organization to push their globalist agenda for America and the world, the “Establishment Elites and International Bankers” have managed to gain significant influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of our government. They can not only advocate their new world order ideas from within the government by using their CFR members in high government positions, but they can also use individual CFR members and research groups financed by their non-profit foundations to bring pressure from another direction.

The international bankers use this progressive process to implement the step by step decisions that will gradually convert the US from a sovereign nation to a subservient position in the new world order run by appointed bureaucrats selected by the international bankers. The CFR is being used much in the same manner as “Tack’s Tackle Shop” was used by an organized criminal group. The international bankers behind the CFR want to give the public the outward appearance of legitimacy in order that they can slowly accomplish their illegal objectives to usurp the US Constitution and the sovereignty of this country.
...
It should also be pointed out that these two concepts benefit the international bankers and large corporations most because they allow these entities to make huge profits by providing financing and/or equipment and products to the enemies of our country during the conflict. It definitely did not benefit the US military men and women who were wounded or died in these conflicts. If a Declaration of War was declared, these same bankers and corporation CEO’s would be charged with treason for aiding the enemy during a time of war.

James Warburg, a CFR member and son of CFR founder Paul Warburg testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, defiantly telling the Senators that: “We shall have world government, whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”
...
"...one way to garner public support for new international treaties would be to propagandize world wide predicaments. If people are scared of terrorism, financial chaos or global warming, they will be willing to cede their national sovereignty, freedom and liberties for global authority.”'

Big push for UN's International Criminal Court

Can't you see the leftist controlled news media supporting the UN with its “Strategic Plan for Outreach”? Just like any propaganda coming from Obama with anything he doesn't like blacked out. Add in support from leftist schools and universities and this UN International Criminal Court abomination will sound like it is the best replacement for our court system.

Gee, aren't you glad that Obama and Hillary and the UN always know what is best for us?

Bruce

'We will be seeing a great deal more of this in the coming months. The ICC has formulated what it calls a “Strategic Plan for Outreach” that includes extensive “public information” campaigns coordinated with media organizations, NGOs, think tanks, schools, universities, religious leaders, foundations and politicians. This “Strategic Plan” is kicking into high gear for 2012, which marks the tenth anniversary of the entry into force of the ICC’s Rome Statute.'

Infiltration, Shariah law and radical Islam: mortal threats to America

I am opposed to any further growth of radical Islam in the US, because I believe the goal of radical Islam is to take over the US and to kill us all.

Bruce

'To be frank, Islamists often rely on brute force to accomplish their goals … crushing their opponents into submission, as we've witnessed with invasion after invasion, throughout history in country after country.

But naked force is NOT the only weapon of Islam's arsenal. In nations like ours, where they are yet a relatively small minority, Muslims rely on stealth jihad. And that is accomplished through the imposition of shariah, the Islamic legal system that demands death for those who oppose Islam and its many legalistic dictates.

You see, Islamic shariah is the antithesis of American constitutional law. In order for shariah to thrive, personal freedom and liberty must die. That is exactly the goal of Islamists in America – and they are making tremendous headway.
...
Shariah law is a harsh and excessive legal and societal code straight from the Middle Ages:

Islamic Brutal Punishment: It encourages husbands to beat their wives.
It allows Muslim men to marry more than one wife, including "child brides" of only a few years old!
It calls for "eye for an eye" revenge rather than justice.
It commands torture for those convicted of crimes, including cutting off hands or feet, mutilation, and even crucifixion.
It demands that "adulterers" – including innocent victims of rape – be stoned to death.
It says anyone critical of Islam or Muhammad must be killed.
It calls for the deaths of "apostates" – that is, anyone who leaves Islam.
It commands violent jihad and the total subjugation or annihilation of all religions other than Islam.

Shariah law is quickly entwining its deadly tentacles through our public schools, our courts, our society.'

Another state questions Obama's eligibility to be a candidate for president - this time it is Pennsylvania

Georgia, Indiana and now Pennsylvania are considering Obama's eligibility to serve. Isn't that an odd coincidence? Do you suppose where there's smoke there's fire? Has Obama and his Democrat friends been less than honest with us?

Bruce

Why do the Democrats want to protect those involved in voter fraud?

My guess would be they want to keep voter fraud alive to "elect" Democrats. Look at previous election scandals for proof.

Bruce

Kingman Letter: KUSD and the New World Order

This appears to be a legitimate concern about the UN and the grip it has on our schools and what is being taught, never mind what is happening to our kids' minds.

Wouldn't you know there are at least two readers who dismiss this concern as a made up conspiracy? They apparently see the UN as a peaceful organization.

Thanks Colonel for the article.

Bruce

Make Mine Freedom - 1948

This 10-minute cartoon from 1948 seemed far fetched back then, but not today.

Thanks George K. Cartoon made by Harding College and AnimationStation.

Bruce

The Secret Government (CIA Overthrow of Mossadeq)

Some people are great believers in coincidences, and dismiss my coverage of events as untrue or conspiracy theories, especially here at the assisted living facility, where I am one of the few people who gets his news from the Internet and not the controlled news media. I just hope that the younger crowd with me takes the time to dig a little and to prove or disprove what I've been saying on this blog for over two years. Just because most people haven't heard of, for example, the North American Union on their TV or in their newspapers doesn't mean it isn't true!

Bruce

"In a vintage video from 1987, Bill Moyers tells how the CIA covertly led the overthrow of the Iranian government and that there was, even then, a secret US government more powerful than elected officials. [The video includes an incredibly accurate prediction of how this hidden group would grow more powerful with the passage of time and, eventually, bring dictatorship to America. Remember, this was broadcast in 1987.] YouTube Posted 2012 Feb 21"

Veterans, Active Military march in D.C. for Ron Paul

Ron Paul is for non-interfering foreign policy, getting the US out of debt, and the Constitution. I agree with that.

Bruce